Control plane
Every co-worker on the previous five screens is a tenant of this one
This is what makes a digital workforce a governed function rather than a pilot that grew. Policies are written once and bind every squad. Evidence is produced as a by-product of the work, not assembled afterwards for an audit. And the honest answer to “what happens when it is wrong” is on this page: it is caught by a control, it is attributable to a named owner, and it can be shown to a regulator in the form they ask for.
Actions logged, 30d
198,400
each with source, model and approver
Policy stops
1,246
refused before the action, not after
Human sign-offs
2,109
median 41 minutes to a decision
Co-workers below bar
4
suspended automatically
Data leaving tenancy
none
models called inside Apollo's estate
A.The policy set — written once, binding on all 268
The enforcement point matters more than the policy text: a rule applied before the action cannot be argued with afterwards.
| Policy | What it prevents | Enforced | Scope | Stopped, 30d | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No client-facing text unreviewed | Any language reaching an adviser, member or platform without a cleared source and a named reviewer | before send | All squads | 318 | Compliance |
| No mark published on one source | A published valuation resting on a single input, or on an input older than its refresh window | before publish | Credit data | 86 | Valuation |
| Jurisdiction gate on eligibility | Product facts being returned to an asker whose registration or permissions do not cover them | before answering | Distribution | 404 | Legal |
| Position detail entitlement | Loan and borrower-level detail reaching anyone outside the institutional entitlement | at retrieval | All squads | 212 | Legal |
| No commitment on Apollo's behalf | Fees, terms or capacity being stated as agreed when only a person can agree them | at drafting | Retirement, distribution | 97 | Commercial |
| Source of record precedence | An answer drawn from a deck or an email when the fund record holds the authoritative value | at retrieval | All squads | 129 | Data governance |
| Segregation of drafting and approval | The co-worker that drafted an item from also being the control that clears it | at workflow | All squads | 0 | Risk |
One action, in full
This record exists for all 4,812 actions this week. It is the unit an audit is assembled from.
act-9f31c04- Action
- Answered partner enquiry 41-2287
- Co-worker
distribution.answer- Asked by
- Kestrel Wealth · UK · approved partner
- Entitlement
- 4 of 6 checks passed, 2 withheld by policy
- Sources
- 6 documents, all in date, versions pinned
- Model
apollo-tenant · reasoning tier 2- Evaluated
- groundedness 0.94 · policy 1.00 · relevance 0.91
- Released by
- P. Nguyen, Distribution · 07:36
- Cost
- $0.14
Retained for the life of the fund plus the statutory period, in Apollo's own storage.
Is the workforce still good at its job
Evaluation runs continuously against suites the co-workers cannot edit.
floor 0.85 — every squad above it
a hard gate, not a score to improve
floor 0.80
floor 0.80 — session level
floor 0.80 — credit data squad is the drag
Suspended this week — 4
Three after a source system changed a field they depended on. One after a model update moved its groundedness score below the floor. All four were suspended by the platform, before anyone noticed the output was worse.
Where the work runs, and what it costs
Model choice is a control, not a preference. Cheapest capable tier first.
- Rules and lookups, no model54%$0
- Small model, retrieval31%$2,140
- Reasoning tier14%$9,880
- Judge and evaluation1%$1,260
$0.19median cost per action cleared
Regulator-ready, on request
Assembled from the action records, not written for the occasion.
- Valuation decision trail, by fund2 min
- Adviser communications, by partner4 min
- Fiduciary evidence file, by scheme3 min
- Model and data residency attestationinstant